How to Save 76,000 Lives in South Africa

July 20th, 2009

Researchers have concluded that if HIV patients start treatment earlier than the World Health Organization recommends, approximately 76,000 lives could be saved in South Africa. In addition, 66,000 cases of associated diseases could be prevented within the next five years. The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine and funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, truly challenges the manner in which HIV has been traditionally treated. The appropriate time to begin treatments is determined by measuring the patient’s CD4 levels. A healthy human’s CD4 levels are between 800-1200 per cubic millimeter of blood. Developed nations traditionally administer treatment to patients when the levels fall below 350. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends starting treatment in South Africa, and other nations, when CD4 levels fall below 200 per cubic millimeter of blood.



According to Rochelle Walensky, leader of the researchers in this study, earlier treatments should begin immediately. “Waiting five years for trial results could be costly in human terms,” she said. She also explained how starting treatment earlier would also help prevent people with HIV from spreading the disease, as the ARTs would be able to reduce the levels of the virus to such low levels, that they would be harder to pass on. The number of 76,000 saved lives was determined assuming that the current infection rates of HIV in South Africa continue and also assuming that 30% of those infected are diagnosed. Approximately 5.7 million people in South Africa have HIV, more than any other nation (South African HIV/AIDS statistics here).

At the fifth IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention, Reuben Granich of WHO also argued that viral load is the greatest risk for HIV transmission. The use of anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) to reduce viral load would significantly reduce the spread of the disease - to the point where Granich believes incidence would reduce from 20,000 per million to 1,000 per million and the number of people living with HIV would be lower than 1% by 2050.



Dr. Francois Venter of the Reproductive Health Research Unit in Johannesburg also spoke at the conference. He used his own experience and studies to show that the debate of when to start ARVs is moot when considering that most patients in sub-Saharan Africa begin treatment very late; the average CD4 count for patients starting treatment is around 100. Studies in South Africa are showing that when patients begin treatment with CD4 levels below 200, there is massive mortality. “Below 200″ is the current South African policy. Dr. Venter says that the majority of patients are entering the treatment system with CD4 levels between 50 and 100. Venter notes that there is a poor linkage between HIV testing and access to ARVs. Dr. Andrew Boulle of the University of Cape Town agrees, “We see the largest mortality before people are enrolled onto ARVs.” A WHO article addressing the ART studies states:


“WHO will be reviewing evidence and revising guidance on ART use, including when to start, for adults and children later this year, but there are many advocates for earlier therapy. There is little doubt that ART has preventive effects; what is uncertain is how best to apply it and combine it with other evidence-based prevention interventions for maximal synergy and benefit.”



The cost of providing ARV treatment on this scale is a looming reason for delayed treatment. But Granich says, “The initial resources would be higher, but over time, given the reduction in HIV incidence, this approach may provide cost savings.” The researchers of the study cited in the Annals of Internal Medicine estimate in their conclusion that if even 10% of people began treatment when higher levels of CD4 were in their blood, the cost of treatment would increase by $142 million over the next five years (offset in part by the reduced incidence of opportunistic disease, such as TB). If 100% began earlier treatments, the additional cost over $1.4 billion, with 221,000 cases of opportunistic disease prevented and 253,000 deaths averted.





Global Financial Crisis Leads to Budget Cuts in Healthcare Throughout Africa

May 18th, 2009

Courtesy of UNICEF

Courtesy of UNICEF




According to a recent report from The World Bank entitled “Averting a Human Crisis During the Global Downturn” (pdf available here), millions of people that are currently undergoing medical intervention for HIV/AIDS with antiretroviral treatment (ART) are faced with the risk of their medicines being interrupted. As international organizations and African governments are experiencing budget cuts due to the financial crisis, the health community fears that increasing unemployment will lead to reduced food security. The resulting loss of quality of nutrition will continue to put pressure on already weak health systems.


Specifically, the World Bank reports that continuity of treatment could be threatened for around 70% of people currently on ART in eastern and southern Africa. The report also addresses commitments that may need to be cut from international aid organizations. According to NAM, a non-profit community based HIV information provider based in the UK, Michel Kazatchkine, Executive Director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria has announced a funding shortfall of $4 billion in 2010. Organizations like the South African Treatment Action Campaign are speaking out to advocate for greater health funding during the crisis, pointing out that “…The region of sub-Saharan Africa bears the greatest burden of disease, and has 68% of the world’s HIV-positive people but only 1% of the global expenditure on health, and 2% of the global health workforce.”


This financial struggle during the global crisis highlights an already alarming problem. In April 2001, the members of the Heads of State and Government of the Organisation of African Unity, met in Abuja, Nigeria, and created the Abuja Declaration, committing to set aside 15% of their national expenditure towards health, specifically to fight HIV/AIDS. According to Paula Akugizibwe, regional advocacy coordinator of Windhoek-based AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa (ARASA) in Namibia, “”Very few countries have met this goal. The money is there. It’s all about prioritisation of resources. The situation is very frightening, because governments cut back on already insufficient HIV treatment and care programmes.” (Click here for full article and Akugizibwe’s comments.)


The World Bank’s report calls for “a combination of efficiency improvements, being selective in cutting of certain types of expenditures, and/or income support mechanisms can allow governments to maintain services that are critical to the most poor and vulnerable.” The report also lists the hazards of stopping treatment for those who are receiving it, including:


- Severe consequences for households (”children orphaned, loss of human capital, increased household poverty”), and the loss of experienced workers to the economy.
- Increased infectiousness of those who stop being treated.
- Diminished drug effectiveness, “requiring use of extremely costly second-line drugs and placing additional demands on health systems to monitor their use.”


Summary of the World Bank’s Key Policy Recommendations regarding HIV/AIDS
- A more rigorous and determined push for efficiency and cost-effectiveness helps countries better prioritize resource allocations across HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention programs.
- For countries with high reliance on external financing for AIDS programs, national authorities and their development partners should identify impending cash flow interruptions and provide bridge financing that, at the very least, prevents treatment interruptions.
- A simple early warning system can help track and minimize treatment interruptions, including better monitoring of drug supplies and use of key health services.
- For countries receiving emergency budget support, an appropriate base level of funding for HIV should be included as part of the social protection package.

****

Interesting links:
- May 18, 2009: South Africa’s Netcare seeing revenue growth as demand for private health care increases
- May 16, 2009: Op-Ed in the New York Times discussing the need to prioritize maternal health in Sierra Leone
- May 14, 2009: African Response to influenza A(H1N1)


May 11, 2009











  • Send to a friend!
  • Share this on Digg
  • Share this on Delicious
  • Share this on Stumble Upon
  • Share this on Facebook
 
  • Visit our MySpace page!
  • Join our Facebook group!